Non-existance part II

As formerly stated – the concept of nothingness is the base of understanding the existance. The existance is not more complicated than just a space where time can occure and a time over which the space can transform. If we have that thing clear – then it is not so hard to understand that the non-existance is the lack of time and space. If we really try to understand how a ”Big Bang” can occure in a non-existance and create time and space, then the thought firstly allmost seems like a philosophical contradiction in terms. How can something (the creation of timespace) actually happen if there is no time, and how can something (a particle, energy, heat) exist if there is no space? The answer simply is – it can´t! It is against the laws of physics. But, yet, the timespace really exists around us and it is growing, we have data on that. It must have started sometime and somewhere. We can even pinpoint the exact location and how old the Universe is. How is it possible? This is something that I will try to explain with my ”Cosmic Bubble Cycle-theory” in a later article. In the Nothingness (or if you prefer ”the non-timespace before the Creation or after the End of the Creation of timespace”) nothing is able to exist. There for no event is able before the creation of the timespace and the discussion over the ”Beginning” often is somewhat pointless and shallow - even on a highly theoretic or philosophical level. There is something stronger than the laws of physics that we have to have in mind if we are trying to analyse the ”time before time” and "being without being" – and that is – The Instinct of Selfpreservation.